large smoke stack with smoke cloud drifting away from it

Climate Legislation: The Only Way to Save The Planet

Why holding big corporations accountable is the only way to significantly reduce the effects of climate change

Social Issues
By VoiceBox ·

Tarun Tapan Bhuyan

Tarun Tapan Bhuyan is a student leader with bold views on global causes. With a strong background in debate and MUNs, he is interested in global diplomacy, politics and linguistics. Certified in global diplomacy and political foundations by the Univerisity of London & Yale, he spreads public awareness on social issues, double standards of the entertainment industry and politics on Quora with his readership going from 20 in 2017 to 4,200,000+ and counting in 2023 and delivered his TedEd Student Talk on the same topic at the age of 13. A Filmmaking Partner at DEARRO & TJS Films, having self-produced a talk show, and multiple video essays on YouTube, his articles have appeared in several state and national newspapers.

Climate Legislation: The Only Way to Save The Planet

Legislators construct policy which results in a global change of ideas. In 2022, the United States passed the Inflation Reduction Act, the nation’s largest piece of federal legislation ever to address climate change. It was USA’s $391 billion insurance against the climate crisis and energy security. However, that has not even scratched the surface of the impact required to combat the crisis.

The recently concluded COP27 ended with a promise to help vulnerable countries against the climate battle. But environmentalists called that “pillow talk”. The real seal of approval came with the “Sharm el-Sheikh Implementation Plan”, an international pledge to “reaffirm the commitment to limit global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.”. The plan gave legal and textual validation to the ethical conversations taking place after the Paris Agreement, putting a “check and balance” of supervision to anyone who violated the terms.

For years, the climate conversation has been mistranslated into a moral and ethical debate instead of the factual danger it presents to biodiversity and lifeforms on the planet. While the future hazard is exacerbated. It also concerningly undermines the present threat that we experience. The media and social culture also present climate action as a communal issue other than the federal and international problem that it is. “Small actions lead to big outcomes,” except here, they don’t. 

That is to say, while societal reinforcement is necessary, it is ignorant and precarious to not hold big corporations responsible. It is impossible to aptly respond to the challenge of the climate crisis without putting a red stamp on instigators of climate depreciation. This includes people, companies, and agencies with large carbon footprints. It is unrealistic to expect any real overturn until the blunders of high-profile individuals are stopped.

Sleek, clean and achievable legislation with judicial ramifications for defaulters and blockage of any legal loopholes is vital to significantly minimise the collateral damages in response to climate change. Without this, with no amount of awareness, social media campaigns and protests will prevail to bring any conclusions. So, citizens should turn to their policymakers to start acting now and deem themselves worthy to be representatives and set a new paradigm of action. Will they be up to the task?



Suggested Articles

  • hand holding up a holographic globe
    Is Internet Culture Now the Absolute Culture?

    Is Internet Culture Now the Absolute Culture?

    How the digital age has reshaped the meaning of the term 'pop culture'

  • black man and woman holding hands
    The Problem with Predatory Age Gaps in Dating

    The Problem with Predatory Age Gaps in Dating

    Why young people should date one another - the alternative is surprisingly popular

  • the chat gpt logo on a 3D square on a teal background
    AI Writing Tools

    AI Writing Tools

    What impact will they have on the future of education?